Talk:Main Page

From ErfWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Modifying this page)
Line 11: Line 11:
::Oh, they're not registering.  Security is currently set to anonymous edits and page creation. --[[User:Ichthus|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus|eyeBook]]) 17:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
::Oh, they're not registering.  Security is currently set to anonymous edits and page creation. --[[User:Ichthus|Ichthus]] ([[User talk:Ichthus|eyeBook]]) 17:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
::True, but more security is never a bad idea, IMO. --[[User:Sethram|Sethram]] 17:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
::True, but more security is never a bad idea, IMO. --[[User:Sethram|Sethram]] 17:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
: Happened again. Well meaning user edited instead of Undo'ed. --[[User:Kreistor|Kreistor]] 20:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:11, 19 May 2009

Separating articles and/or article content into the (very much necessary) categories of canon, proposed canon, and speculation is going to be a chore. Marking them with three distinctive text colours would probably be a dumb idea. --130.232.134.69 13:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Should we replace links that go to Giantitp with links to erfworld.com? Or will both be used? Or just one?--70.139.85.108 04:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

I'd suggest: replace the links, but not as a particulary high priority.SteveMB 15:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Modifying this page

On May 19, a couple of attempts were made to add spam links to this page. If you detect such an attempt, do not try to fix the problem by editing the page. Go to the "History" page and use the "Undo" feature to remove the change. As a result of a couple of kind-hearted and well-meant repairs, two very important and LEGAL sections disappeared, probably because the repairs were made without noticing the spam deleted those sections. I have undone everything that occurred on the 19th, and restored it to the state of the previous day. --Kreistor 05:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I've requested in the forums that some security be tossed onto the main page. Being as they only appear to be attacking that page, locking it down should be fairly easy. --Ichthus (eyeBook) 09:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Is there any sort of CAPTCHA plugin one could add to the registration page? I'm not familiar with modding wiki software so I'm not even sure something like it exists. --Sethram 16:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Oh, they're not registering. Security is currently set to anonymous edits and page creation. --Ichthus (eyeBook) 17:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
True, but more security is never a bad idea, IMO. --Sethram 17:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Happened again. Well meaning user edited instead of Undo'ed. --Kreistor 20:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Go To:
Personal tools