Cubbins wrote:I guess 'Arkensaw' was too obvious.
Oh well, shoes it is!
WarFAN wrote:vrellum wrote:It's looking more like Banhammer is just a fool. Very disappointing.
Banhammer was pictured as a very obvious fool from his very first appereance:
http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F082.jpg
Thinking about him as some kind of... Yoda or Mr. Fantastic or something like that has always seemed to me as one of the wildest and unfathomable theories of this forum. Usually, the obvious is just true.
WarFAN wrote:vrellum wrote:It's looking more like Banhammer is just a fool. Very disappointing.
Banhammer was pictured as a very obvious fool from his very first appereance:
http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F082.jpg
Thinking about him as some kind of... Yoda or Mr. Fantastic or something like that has always seemed to me as one of the wildest and unfathomable theories of this forum. Usually, the obvious is just true.

Are we talking about the same Mr. Fantstic?
WarFAN wrote:Are we talking about the same Mr. Fantstic?
Yeah. The guy with the brains, as opposed to Banjammer´s philosophic babbling (does this last word exist? English is not my first lenguaje...).



Salem wrote:WarFAN wrote:Are we talking about the same Mr. Fantstic?
Yeah. The guy with the brains, as opposed to Banjammer´s philosophic babbling (does this last word exist? English is not my first lenguaje...).
It does in fact exist.
BanJolnir is a fool. Agreed. So's Mr. F though in the same way. They're smart, and they think that makes them flawless.
Salem wrote:WarFAN wrote:Are we talking about the same Mr. Fantstic?
Yeah. The guy with the brains, as opposed to Banjammer´s philosophic babbling (does this last word exist? English is not my first lenguaje...).
It does in fact exist.
BanJolnir is a fool. Agreed. So's Mr. F though in the same way. They're smart, and they think that makes them flawless.
bladestorm wrote:BanJolnir is a fool. Agreed. So's Mr. F though in the same way. They're smart, and they think that makes them flawless.
Though Mr Fantastic has used his brain to save the planet and the universe on several occasions, that doesn't make him smart. Part of his power set is to wrap his brain around a particular problem. That solution works for that problem, and that problem alone. His intellect pretty much ended with the creation of fabric made from unstable molecules. Such outfits are a staple of the superhero community, but Reed has since produced only Deus Ex Machinas -- used once and then forgotten. He capitalized early on a few inventions, and then started practicing tinkering dilettantism. Lots of money, secluded away from normal people, doing whatever he damn well pleases. If he were as smart as he claims he is, he'd have devised cures for diseases galore, helped society in numerous ways, managed to cure the Thing (or more optimally, alter his appearance while maintaining his powers), found ways to preempt most of the disasters he has to save the world from (like a cloaking devise to hide the energy signatures of the planet from Galactus), and moved on from "what can I build to beat up this bad guy" to "this bad guy has a need that is being unfulfilled and he is using violence to satisfy that need -- what can I build that will make it so that his need is fulfilled without such violence...hmm, now extrapolate that out to at least the fifth degree to prevent any one-shot use and to be able to perpetuate the usefulness of it....carry the one...cross reference for a broader aspect of usefulness...."
ftl wrote:If Banhammer's just an idiot, how come his side's stayed alive for so long?
Salem wrote:As for the idea that Wanda would have a set of arkenshoes, it doesn't fit the narative. She goes through all this effort to get her hands on a tool whether she can attune or not and she wants to get all the attuned together. Why hasn't everyone in GK tried on the shoes if that's the case? It just seems to stretched. But there could very well be a reason.

multilis wrote:
He is very dedicated (zealot) to a world without war.
WarFAN wrote:multilis wrote:
He is very dedicated (zealot) to a world without war.
Janis is a zealot. A pacifist militant. Banhammer is, at the very best, a scholar monk feeded by a warrior-daughter whom he despises.
multilis wrote:WarFAN wrote:multilis wrote:
He is very dedicated (zealot) to a world without war.
Janis is a zealot. A pacifist militant. Banhammer is, at the very best, a scholar monk feeded by a warrior-daughter whom he despises.
He founded a bubble kingdom that tries to avoid conquest. Every mention of war/bloodshed and he grimaces. He hates idea of fighting (but willing to do so if needed). So I guess the philosophy he thinks is worth saving includes reducing violence.
What his feelings are for his daughter... we only have Jills biased viewpoint on that, the dislike of violence, and the recent flying in to rescue Jill.
Sizemore dislikes war. Maggie says we "should" find slaughter repulsive. Likely room for a fair number who dislike idea of killing others, and ultimate way to have that is to have no wars in entire world.
A bubble kingdom that dominates entire world is one way to end all war/violence. (Pax Romana)
(One version of bubble kingdom would be to have entire magic kingdom control world, ready to wipe out any side that starts a war)
Flowers&DeathSkulls wrote:3.The shoes never leave Oz. It is likely that they cannot, as BOTH shoes fell off of Dorothy in midair as she was going back to Kansas. Incidentally, even though they fell off in the Deadly Desert in Oz, Dorothy still arrived in Kansas safely. When Dorothy recovers the shoes, she gives them to the ruler of Oz instead of taking them with her so they do not get lost again and retain their use (as magic may not work in Kansas).
Salem wrote:Kreistor wrote:Anyway, this Speculation about Tools having Primary associations to schools is clearly and obviously false without a lot more supportable statements in the comic.
I just find this statement off. I mean how can something be obviously false if it's possible that more evidence might support it. The two clauses are kind of a contradiction.
Users browsing this forum: elecampane, Fcannon, Google [Bot] and 13 guests