bladestorm wrote:... would be the VHW, but having King Banhammer fall into their lap looks very much like the EW.
... you lost me there.
bladestorm wrote:... would be the VHW, but having King Banhammer fall into their lap looks very much like the EW.


drachefly wrote:bladestorm wrote:... would be the VHW, but having King Banhammer fall into their lap looks very much like the EW.
... you lost me there.
teratorn wrote:zbeeblebrox wrote:Wait, it doesn't? I could've sworn the first time we hear about Haffaton is when they provide High Elves to help the alliance against Stanley. Now I have to go look up what I'm misremembering...
You're probably thinking of Hobbittm...
bladestorm wrote:drachefly wrote:bladestorm wrote:... would be the VHW, but having King Banhammer fall into their lap looks very much like the EW.
... you lost me there.
Prisoner is alert?

CelebrenIthil wrote:I wonder if it's in the realm of Foolamancy to fake turning.
It would involve somehow letting the other Side see you and count you as their unit, stats and everything included, and not just a cosmetic change in livery... I'm not sure it can be pulled off - or at least, the Side's leader is sure not to fall for it. But now that I'm writing this, I realize that Haffaton's case is particular in that a caster runs the show and keeps the ruler as a puppet. Therefore, the one you really want to fool here, Olive, might actually fall for it since she lacks Ruler senses. Hrm...





effataigus wrote:Seems unlikely to me that a turning leader becomes an heir by default... are you suggesting that it this would supplant existing heirs? If not, then how would Banhammer avoid being desploofed by Olive after she becomes overlord? Keep in mind that he would have to have a way to bump her off that he couldn't just use right now before Judy is dead for his plan to make sense.
This would also mean that you can turn as a hostile action right before killing an overlord... then subsume their entire side. Needs permission by current overlord? Not that we saw... Judy is nowhere about.
Finally, narrative convention suggests that this situation should not be resolved by rules that have yet to be revealed (admittedly, that line of argument led us to the conclusion that the dwagons would have to be disbanded until the update before they were harvested).
bladestorm wrote: And she gets called a gold-digger by the new daughter in law, who may actually be older.
effataigus wrote:Good point. Perhaps the point of the subterfuge (if any is even happening) is to trick Olive into thinking it's safe to do something that will justify Banhammer taking the deplorable low road... as opposed to enabling him to do so as I was assuming.name lips wrote:This would be an excellent way of luring Olive into a trap. Once she thinks she has won, she will reveal her true colors, and possibly let down her guard.
effataigus wrote:Hmm, many moons ago I conceded the point that "silent orders" as described here (specifically sent from beyond earshot and eyesight) were not supported by the comic despite my vaguely remembering them having occurred... I later became convinced that I was miss-remembering orders by natural allies, which are sent by natural thinkamancy. Weird to see them show up now.
More pertinently, why make a stink about them being used now? Why didn't Banhammer just send a note, as is his wont? He seems the type to get super-excited about designing the wedding invitation with the perfect signamancy. My guess is that it is being established that Banhammer could be directing much more than what Jillian is seeing... Telepathically ordering his casters to put on a show for Olive. I just hope there is a good reason why. I'm trying to figure out what he is trying to do that couldn't be accomplished better, faster, and safer by a more direct approach.
Aquillion wrote:I wonder if it will be important that Olive, since she is technically not a ruler, lacks a ruler's natural thinkamancy?
zbeeblebrox wrote: Although I have no clue why Banhammer would keep Jillian out of the loop unless having her go independent is part of the plan (someone mentioned that turn order would change?).


Users browsing this forum: bensans, kagato23, Lilwik, Lipkin, Whispri, Zeal and 29 guests