Well, "return for the investment" implies a discussion of ratios to me, so I'm glad we agreebladestorm wrote: any argument involving ratios is always going to favour the minimum investment
Whispri wrote:That said, if you want to reset this pool and start over with fixed bids, I'm fine with it.
effataigus wrote:Whispri wrote:That said, if you want to reset this pool and start over with fixed bids, I'm fine with it.
drachefly wrote:I don't understand this system.
Interesting... since the requirement that they be present in the scene was removed with the second iteration of the bet... this seems to have been resolved... but I'd buy arguments that the pot should go to Whispri(for Maxwell), arguments that it should go to Nnelg (since Tina was all but confirmed to be a Turnamancer just before Maxwell was explicitly called a moneymancer), or perhaps arguments that it should be split by a bunch of us (since this update named at least 3 of ours). Anyway, I believe I owe someone 5 Quatloos... Blade, you're impartial and the contest's creator... what say you?drachefly wrote:We have had named in Inner Peace 54: Maxwell, a thinkamancer, and Tina, a turnamancer, and then more I'm sure we haven't seen before. Have both of those been named before? I think Tina was, but wasn't confirmed as a turnamancer.
Users browsing this forum: walpurgisborn and 1 guest