Dancing Cthulhu wrote:theseus2x wrote:Maybe Wanda wants to croak/decrypt Jillian?
Turning Jillian into a decrypted? A unit that must (it seems) serve unquestioningly and love Wanda? I can't see it appealing to her.
Yeah, as I mentioned, this is exactly what I think also. "Croaking" a unit has deep emotional significance for an Erfworlder. Ansom sure reacted to Ossomer's death. I think Wanda would feel the same way at Jillian's death too.
Dancing Cthulhu wrote:[Gez wrote:Wanda likes "going too far" in her control of Jillian. Are you sure she wouldn't croak her, now that she can decrypt her afterwards?
But is that too far even for Wanda? I mean a bit of thinkamancy is one thing, but turning Jillian into someone compelled to love and serve Wanda... and we don't really know what Wanda feels about decrypted (as I mentioned above) - she hasn't shown them much consideration. Charlie seems to care more about his Archons - would Wanda think a decrypted Jillian is still her Jillian?
Again, yes. Remember also about the whole dungeon torture thing: Jillian seems to like it/be ok with it somehow. Her comment about Vanna, "she doesn't play right," is kinda telling. Not sure what's going on there. Maybe Erfworlder's don't feel pain the same way people do. As long as you have 1 hit point left you're ok. But kinda weird nevertheless. I wonder if this aspect of Jillian's personality will ever be addressed.
Dancing Cthulhu wrote:[Watsit Hoohow wrote:She actively betrayed FAQ to Stanley while she was working for it. So if she does rejoin FAQ, it won't be for that reason.
Although through loyalty contortions it could be said she didn't think Faq would end up like it did.
I think Wanda may have had other predictions too, more than she let on to Parson. I wonder if those also could have led to her putting Faq in danger the way she did.