Lamech wrote:So, I have a question: Can clay make items that auto-alter units dice? Say a hat of critical strikes? Be good for in combat.
The only thing we have seen like that is Duncan's laurel. That required a three-caster link to create. I would imagine what you describe would require it as well.
multilis wrote:Hit and run tactics are used in current age of instantaneous communication.
I phrased that poorly. I was refering to the fact that a Ruler always has some idea what is happening to the side's units and can issue commands without any form of communication. In a situation like that, you can never destroy an enemy column and have the enemy be unaware of it. You'll never have an enemy make moves that rely on the assumption that they have support when the support has already been destroyed. If an enemy unit makes contact with you, their side will know your location, no matter how quickly or completely you destroy that unit. Once again, I'm not claiming there is no benefit to hit-and-run tactics, but they do sacrifice advantages in Erfworld.
In the modern era, hit-and-run tactics require those employing them to be able to disappear. They need to either blend into the civilian population or vanish into the wilderness. In Erfworld, there is no civilian population. In Erfworld a side can't vanish into the wilderness. In Erfworld, a side is tied to their cities, so the enemy always knows where to find them. If Lord Firebaugh loses his cities, he could go the barbarian route, but he would lose his treasury and production capabilities. On a barbarian's purse, he couldn't afford the upkeep of one caster, let alone three. Attrition would favor his enemies, since they can replace their losses and he could not. Also, in the modern era, guerilla warfare often depends on the enemy’s civilian population losing the will to fight. That won’t happen in Erfworld.
I am in favor of Goodminton employing such tactics. They're all about being strong where the enemy is weak and getting the most use out of limited resources. They could buy Goodminton time, but I just don't see guerrilla warfare being a winning strategy in Erfworld the way it can be on Earth. Without change the whole complexion of the conflict, Goodminton will fall sooner or later. A military genius may find a way, but Erfworld seems lacking in those.
multilis wrote:Lots of turn based games similar to Erfworld. Eg I read of someone describing a Warlords 3 game where he was vastly outnumbered against AI and played hit and run to eventually win an impossible game.
I personally am now playing Age of Wonders 2 - Shadow magic (was only a few dollars with electronic purchase/download). I often set game to turn based classic, which is similar to erfworld to get rid of the advantages from moving before and after enemies on a turn, etc. Hit and run is one of the most powerful tactics when facing super strong enemies (that includes using small fast armies as distraction). Another is to convert some of enemy army to your side, any way you can.
I also play online multiplayer strategy games, including massively multiplayer. One of fun things is to be a lone wolf against a powerful alliance with many members... one of your advantages is humans in large alliance are more laid back, waiting for one of their allies to deal with you rather than risk hurting their own personal army. Usually you do lots of hit and run, and try to make sure that every player that hits you feels more pain than gain. (I usually pretend to be easy prey and wait for powerful pirates to try and rob me, so I play a fairly good level of enemy. You don't win all the time against much superior foes, but you can win. Almost always you can cause several times as many enemy to lose as well)
I did start my post with the caveat that I was using historical examples and they do not fit perfectly with how Erfworld works. While I play some strategy games, I don’t play them often, so I'm far from an expert on them. Therefore, I will concede the point that many of the game aspects of Erfworld may impact the situation in ways I may not expect. I've always been a student of history, so that's the prism through which I view military situations.
On the other hand, if we were watching Erfworld as a game, I would imagine it as a game where all the sides are controlled by AI. Parson is the first "player" in Erfworld. The reason I say this is because Ansom was thought to be one of the greatest military minds in Erfworld. If I were to compare Ansom to a historic figure, it would be John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough. He was certainly a general of outstanding ability, but he wouldn't be ranked among the great captains of history. Marlborough’s ambition and skill, both martial and diplomatic, propelled him from obscurity to prominence and transformed England from a peripheral to major power in Europe. His relationship with Prince Eugene of Savoy, perhaps the greatest military collaboration in history, reminds me of Ansom’s relationship with Vinny. While Eugene was probably the more clever and skillful of the two, it was Marlborough who was the de facto
leader of the armies of the Grand Alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession, holding a discordant coalition together through the sheer force of his personality.
Warfare in the 18th century was mostly stagnant and pedantic. Few leaders had the ability to follow the example of Gustavus Adolphus with imagination and energy. Most simply copied the external aspects of his military organization without realizing his true genius was the flexibility with which he employed his forces. For example, Gustavus’s army was highly disciplined. Instead of realizing the discipline was a means to an end, for many commanders, discipline became an end unto itself. Tactical perfection was considered to consist of the ability to form perfect lines and maintain these lines even during the heat of battle. Warfare was ruled by convention, and Marlborough, while very successful, was content to conform to convention. He can be compared to a general that can
be listed as one of history’s great captains: Frederick II, King of Prussia. Frederick pushed the limits of warfare in his era. He innovated. He introduced speed and maneuverability to warfare that had become slow and plodding. Even he, however, was not able to completely break the shackles of his time. In the 18th century, armies consisted of vagabonds led by nobles. There probably has never been a period of history in which there was a bigger gulf between officers and the common soldiers. The soldiers were only kept in line with the harshest discipline. If given an opportunity, they would desert en masse
. Losses from desertion caused greater attrition than those from casualties or disease. While Frederick was a military genius, his greatest weakness, a failure to pursue after a decisive victory, was caused by a fear that his army would melt away in desertions were he to unleash it in pursuit. It would take the ruthless genius of Napoleon Bonaparte to shatter completely the rigid system of 18th-century warfare and forever alter the conduct of war.
For the sake of this comparison, Charlie is Frederick the Great, and Parson is Napoleon.
In my opinion Wanda's side still has some chance, because their enemies are so sloppy and overconfident, likely don't trust each other, and also face external threats. Part of game is diplomacy... eg "render the enemy unable to unwilling to take the garrison/city/side" http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F124.jpg
. If any side that takes you fears being destroyed next, that can make them unwilling. So far Wanda's father seems fairly good at that part.
I’m not so sure able that. A couple of days after the update, it became obvious to me that Haffaton was behind the delay in the capital strike. If Frenemy and Quisling had taken Goodminton while Wanda was in the field, she would have disbanded. Haffaton wants Wanda keenly, so they had Goodminton’s “allies” wait until her column had reached the capital. Frenemy and Quisling have been collaborating with Haffaton for a while now, since before Wanda popped. They enabled Haffaton to seize Goodfinger. They have been feeding them information for some time. They’re in too deep to get cold feet now. Soldiers in the 18th century fought because they feared their officers’ whips more than the enemies’ bayonets. Haffaton seems like a regional power. Quisling and Frenemy are probably more afraid of what Haffaton will do if they don’t follow through with whatever arrangement they’ve made than what the other may be plotting.
multilis wrote:In current situation Wanda's side wants to keep having smaller fights non-stop, because uncroaked decay but have zero upkeep. If you don't have many cities you have to replace troops by taking them from enemy, and you don't have to worry about the large converted army driving you bankrupt.
I’m not claiming Goodminton’s situation is hopeless, and I certainly don’t think Goodminton will fall immediately. I think they will last dozens of turns more. I do think their end in inevitable, though. While I love Fritz, he’s practical but not particularly brilliant or imaginative. I can’t see him coming up with strategies that play to his side’s strengths. A tactic that would work would be the same one Parson used in his siege raid, engage part of a stack, grab the bodies and disengage. I don’t think Fritz would think of something like that. Lord Firebaugh has repeatedly demonstrated that diplomacy is a weakness of his. He allowed his alliance to deteriorate to the point where his allies were actively working against him. Even when it became obvious they were, he refused to end the alliance simply because he had never broken an alliance in his life. He failed to come to a diplomatic settlement with Haffaton when it was advantageous to do so. Even though he has insight into the minds of his enemies, a very valuable trait, he has shown he is unable to seal the deal diplomatically.
Haffaton has the advantage of strategic initiative. Goodminton has the advantage of interior lines. Haffaton would have to be moronic to concede the initiative. Any strategy that relies on the enemy making mistakes is going to lose. In order for Goodminton to do this, Haffaton would have to divide their forces so that Goodminton could attack them piecemeal. Goodminton would always have to croak more than they lose or their force will eventually evaporate. They would always have to hold the field after the battle, or they won’t be able to claim the spoils. They would always have to have their most valuable asset on the front, an asset Haffaton wants badly. Haffaton can counter Goodminton in copious ways. They can consolidate and wait for the uncroaked to decay. They can keep their forces concentrated, so there isn’t any chance of Haffaton conceding the hex. They can move against multiple targets at once. Goodminton can’t defend everything, and they may spread themselves too thin trying. They could set another trap and capture Wanda. There are probably other ways that I’m not considering, but Haffaton and their allies will not just be sitting back and letting Goodminton pick their targets. They will be working against them.
multilis wrote:" Haffaton will bring them in line" - Haffaton scored a chief warlord kill by using dirty backstab tactic, but then blundered the bigger fight. They sent an army that *should* have won which means big army, and as result Wanda's army is now stronger. Deep in enemy territory, Haffaton had all the time in the world to prepare, and they blow it so badly...
Who cares how they got the kill? I’ve never really seen the logic to honor and rules in warfare. War means that the rules have been thrown out the window. At the start of World War I, the French wore vivid uniforms intended to dominate the morale of the enemy. They learned, to their horror, that machine guns don’t have any morale to be dominated. War is horrible and ugly. If a side or nation deems it necessary, however, trying to hold on to ideals instead of getting the job done will only lead to disaster.
Haffaton’s loss can be pinned on Larry. He had something to prove. Whether he was simply that
obsessed with Wanda or he felt he had to prove his loyalty because he considered turning, he put himself at risk and Un-Tommy got a lucky critical. Without Larry’s leadership bonus, Fritz’s higher bonus prevailed. Also, Wanda stated that her force was stronger by unit count, which does not mean that her force is qualitatively stronger. The horde of uncroaked on the walls of Gobwin Knob were no match for Ansom, by himself, with the Arkenpliers and his carpet. Haffaton and her collaborators have made mistakes. Sending Larry to capture Wanda was one. Retreating from the “shock and awe” at Goodminton was another. The fact that Goodminton left a Frenemy warlord alive is telling. They needed Frenemy to retreat. They didn’t even have the firepower to shoot down one of their opponent’s forces. We have seen enemy warlords make poor decisions that have benefitted Goodminton, but Goodminton can’t rely on them to always make poor decisions. Goodminton isn’t even fully united in purpose. While they worked well together to deal with the immediate threat to their capital, there is too much friction between Wanda, Delphie and Lord Firebaugh for them to work to their best effect.
This conflict reminds me of the American Civil War. Haffaton seems better at diplomacy and better at keeping other sides out of the conflict. Haffaton, the Union, can afford multiple decisive defeats. Goodminton, the Confederacy, cannot afford a single disastrous defeat. If their army is destroyed, they’ve lost the war. Also, Goodminton doesn’t have a Robert E. Lee. If they did, they’d have a chance.
I’ll admit I may be wrong. I don’t claim to be an expert on any of this. This is just how I see the situation.
Berserkas wrote:Making a note here, i think we can now safely assume that even Healomancers and every other caster class there is have pretty devastating combat spells/abilities.
Also, Wanda commented that every caster is popped knowing the hoboken spell. So every
caster in Erfworld has some direct damage capabilities as well.
0beron wrote:I would hazard a guess that Dirtamancy is not just limited to improving the quality of an upgrade bought with schmukers. With a powerful enough spell, a full upgrade without schmukers could be possible. Sizemore simply hasn't done this because either 1) he's not high level enough to have the juice for it, and/or 2)GK had schmuckers to spare, and needed his juice for other things instead.
Also I imagine that a proper upgrade has to be done at a particular time, whereas the spell can be cast at any point, thus allowing for this element of surprise.
I'm not claiming there is no limit the the upgrades that can be performed. I do think, however, that the effect of the scroll could have been, "this is the level 4 tower/city you would
of had if you'd had a Dirtamancer." On the other hand, we know a Dirtamancer guides the upgrades themselves. Wanda didn't do that. It is possible the scroll itself did. Anyway, I acknowledge the likelihood that I'm wrong.
0beron wrote:I agree with multilis. Because we don't KNOW what Delphi "knows" or if what she told is even the truth, we can't conclude what Fate has in store for Wanda in this phase of her life.
Delphi may have in fact seen something totally different, and made up what she has said so far in an attempt to alter Fate, and in the process set up pain in her own future. This possibility would still result in Wanda developing the same philosophy, but learning from Delphi's mistakes rather than her own.
We don't need
to know what Delphie "knows." For the purposes of this speculation, we only need to know what Delphie told Wanda, because it is the change in Wanda's beliefs that hints at the future. While it is certainly possible that Wanda has been told things off screen or will receive more information in future updates, as of right now Delphie has told the following to Wanda:
Delphie knew Wanda would pop as a caster.
Goodminton will be assaulted from the air.
Delphie will only be Wanda's Chief for a short time.
Wanda's Fate is tied to Olive, and Olive will be her Chief for a long time.
Lord Firebaugh refusing the original peace offer doomed Goodminton.
Delphie will croak, and Wanda will have an opportunity to reanimate her.
Wanda has a Destiny, is protected by Fate and doesn't need Luckamancy.
Fighting Fate is pointless. It will happen anyway, just in a more painful fashion.
I think that is all of them. The first three have
happened. Future Wanda has fully embraced the last two. It doesn't matter what untold details Delphie may have left out, because it is only the information Wanda has access to that will impact her future beliefs.
It's possible it's an as yet unspoken of mechanic, but no mention has been made of improving a City without increasing it's level. While Dirt magic may not be needed to upgrade a City, it helps. And lowers the cost
. Indeed, the scroll's price tag may have included the entirety of that cost, material component style. Note that in the future era, Sizemore will be flying out to rebuild Cities Wanda burns to the ground
, not to improve the ones she decides to keep. This really does suggest he can't
improve them without Levelling them. Maybe not even that, if the Sites in question have some sort of hard Level limit.
In the case of Sizemore rebuilding razed cities, they were being razed because they produced less than desirable unit types. The whole reason he may have been needed was to "attune" the site to his side, so that they produced the same units as the capital. If Gobwin Knob had simply razed the cities and rebuilt without Sizemore, it is possible they would have produced their default unit types. I may be wrong, and it is an unspoken mechanic, but I wanted to point out the possibility that levelling the city was not the only way to interpret what happened.
0beron wrote:Charlie cannot "project" through Archons...he uses Thinkamancy to communicate with them, and the Archons in his tower manage the connection when, "clients" contact him.
It was stated in one of the Summer Updates that Charlie can and does grant some of the functionality of the Arkendish to his personal archons. On the other hand, it is
a Thinkamancy artifact. Thinkamancy is about linking units and sharing abilities and knowledge. The other Arkentools very likely don't have that ability.
Kaed wrote: Berserkas wrote:
(although rations are mostly popped, poisoning food supplies is nigh impossible, but you can still cause real damage with them, as shown by Tommy's death.
You don't know that. Maybe there's a Florist spell that causes an opposing stack/side's next rations popped to be poisoned. I don't expect the poison would be as strong as what killed Tommy, but definitely perhaps enough to weaken the enemy and making winning the battle more easy.
On the other hand, maybe the act of poisoning someone can only be done while entertaining another side 'peacefully', while providing them with rations, or by tipping your own unit's weapons with it. Perhaps the use of poison in Erfworld is by definition act act of betrayal. We don't really know enough to make assumptions yet. xD
Also, most sides seem to prefer not to rely on popped provisions, probably because those get deducted directly from the treasury. They prefer to take the food from farms and the larder and carry provisions with them. If they are carrying their food with them, it can be poisoned. A Florist might even be able to poison a farm, so all the provisions it produces are lethal.
Morni wrote:So maybe Delphie saw that Olive Branch had a 97% chance of being Wanda's chief caster.. and took that as it's going to happen.
That is Mathamancy, not Predictamancy. They're very different things
When Parson first got his bracer, Sizemore told him that there were Mathamancy dependent sides that paired Mathamancers with Luckamancers. They would predict the crucial battles and then tilt their outcomes in their favor. Given that information, there does seem to be some overlap between Mathamancy and Predictamancy, in their utility if not their mechanism.